Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Ritesh,
>
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 09:21:47 +0530 "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
>> index 71cd1ceba191..8cd17a5fc72b 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
>> @@ -1464,6 +1464,11 @@ const char * const vmstat_text[] = {
>>      [I(DIRECT_MAP_LEVEL2_COLLAPSE)]         = "direct_map_level2_collapses",
>>      [I(DIRECT_MAP_LEVEL3_COLLAPSE)]         = "direct_map_level3_collapses",
>>  #endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
>> +    "slb_kernel_faults",
>> +    "slb_user_faults",
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK_STATS
>>      [I(VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS)]                   = "vma_lock_success",
>>      [I(VMA_LOCK_ABORT)]                     = "vma_lock_abort",
>
> Should you be using explicit indexes and the I() macro?

Aah yes, I guess the branch where I developed the patches was not
upstream tip and when I rebased and tested, I missed to see the I()
macro change in mm/vmstat. 

Thanks Stephen for pointing it out. I will fix that in the next revision.

-ritesh

>
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Reply via email to