Hi Yury.

On 3/19/26 9:06 AM, Yury Norov wrote:
Switch the function to using modern cpumask API and drop most of the
housekeeping code.

Notice, if first >= nr_cpu_ids, for_each_cpu_wrap() iterator behaves just
like for_each_cpu(), i.e. begins from 0. So even if WARN_ON() is triggered,
no special handling is needed.

Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <[email protected]>
---
  arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 31 ++++++-------------------------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c 
b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index e91ec9036ad8..4e05f678e171 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -548,40 +548,21 @@ static void xive_dec_target_count(int cpu)
  static int xive_find_target_in_mask(const struct cpumask *mask,
                                    unsigned int fuzz)
  {
-       int cpu, first, num, i;
+       int cpu, first;
/* Pick up a starting point CPU in the mask based on fuzz */
-       num = cpumask_weight(mask);
-       first = fuzz % num;
-
-       /* Locate it */
-       cpu = cpumask_first(mask);
-       for (i = 0; i < first && cpu < nr_cpu_ids; i++)
-               cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, mask);
-
-       /* Sanity check */
-       if (WARN_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
-               cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
-
-       /* Remember first one to handle wrap-around */
-       first = cpu;
+       fuzz %= cpumask_weight(mask);
+       first = cpumask_nth(fuzz, mask);
+       WARN_ON(first >= nr_cpu_ids);
/*
         * Now go through the entire mask until we find a valid
         * target.
         */
-       do {
-               /*
-                * We re-check online as the fallback case passes us
-                * an untested affinity mask
-                */
+       for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, mask, first) {
                if (cpu_online(cpu) && xive_try_pick_target(cpu))
                        return cpu;
-               cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, mask);
-               /* Wrap around */
-               if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-                       cpu = cpumask_first(mask);
-       } while (cpu != first);
+       }
return -1;
  }

Only concern i have, (which could potentially leads to while(1) loop
today if it), is if mask is empty. atleast for_each_cpu_wrap will not
be a while(1) loop.

So, IMO this is better than what we have today.

nit: maybe a good to add a WARN_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) in the end.

Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <[email protected]>


Reply via email to