* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-hash64.h:17,
>>> from arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h:8,
>>> from arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h:8,
>>> from arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c:20:
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h:76: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
>>> '__attribute__' before 'memstart_addr'
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h:77: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
>>> '__attribute__' before 'kernstart_addr'
>>>
>>> Caused by commit 600715dcdf567c86f8b2c6173fcfb4b873e25a19 ("generic: add
>>> phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses") from the tip-core tree.
>>> This only fails if CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is set.
>>>
>>> I have applied the patch below.
>>>
>>
>> applied to tip/core/urgent, thanks Stephen!
>>
>
> Shouldn't this go via a ppc tree? Won't having ppc changes in tip.git
> make people grumpy?
it was broken via a generic topic: tip/core/resources, not the x86 tree.
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
