On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 7:37 PM Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Huacai, > > On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 06:14:52PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 4:50 PM Jinjie Ruan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Jinjie Ruan (16): > > > riscv: kexec_file: Fix crashk_low_res not exclude bug > > > powerpc/crash: Fix possible memory leak in update_crash_elfcorehdr() > > > arm64: kexec: Fix image->elf_headers memory leak during retry loop > > > x86/kexec: Fix potential buffer overflow in prepare_elf_headers() > > > arm64: kexec_file: Fix potential buffer overflow in > > > prepare_elf_headers() > > > riscv: kexec_file: Fix potential buffer overflow in > > > prepare_elf_headers() > > > LoongArch: kexec: Fix potential buffer overflow in > > > prepare_elf_headers() > > > crash: Add crash_prepare_headers() to exclude crash kernel memory > > > arm64: kexec_file: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code > > > x86/kexec: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code > > > riscv: kexec_file: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code > > > LoongArch: kexec: Use crash_prepare_headers() helper to simplify code > > > crash: Use crash_exclude_core_ranges() on powerpc > > > arm64: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > > > riscv: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation > > > arm64/crash: Add crash hotplug support > > I have some bikesheedings about the subjects. Can we unify the prefix > > formats? > > x86/kexec, arm64: kexec_file, riscv: kexec_file, LoongArch: kexec ..... > > It might look weird in the series, but powerpc and x86 use '/' and arm64 and > riscv use ':' so in the logs in arch/ this would be actually fine. OK, but at least we can unify kexec and kexec_file.
Huacai > > With the only exception of arm64/crash that should have been arm64: crash: > > > Huacai > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Mike.
