On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 8:50 AM Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This corresponds to a floating point instruction. Although we have > > disabled fpu, vsx and altivec we are still generating these. Seems like > > we have some issue with the rustc here. I didn't dive deeper into this. > > > > Is it ok if we keep 1.95 as base for powerpc64le? > > It may be that it is generated but unused (we have that issue > elsewhere -- see e.g. `rust/compiler_builtins.rs`). > > Having said that, if 1.95 is fine for the powerpc arch maintainers, > then that is fine (s390 also used a higher minimum -- please see the > recent change in `scripts/min-tool-version.sh`). > > But please try to bisect upstream Rust to see where the change > happened, i.e. what is the root cause? e.g. `core` changes, `rustc` > changes, built-in LLVM changes... It could be that it is not tied to > the `rustc` version but LLVM's. > > Cheers, > Miguel Hey Miguel,
Sure i'll bisect. Meanwhile i would still like to get this upstream. Hey @Madhavan, Can we pick this version up for ppc? Regards, Mukesh
