On 2026/07/09 01:57 PM, leixiang wrote:
> Set irqfd->producer only after kvmppc_set_passthru_irq() succeeds to
> avoid leaving a dangling pointer on failure. The bypass manager does
> not register a failed producer, so the pointer is never cleared.
> 
> Fixes: c57875f5f9be ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Enable IRQ bypass")
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: leixiang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 61dbeea317f3..ff7b25629125 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -6111,12 +6111,12 @@ static int kvmppc_irq_bypass_add_producer_hv(struct 
> irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
>       struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
>               container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer);
>  
> -     irqfd->producer = prod;
> -
>       ret = kvmppc_set_passthru_irq(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi);
>       if (ret)
>               pr_info("kvmppc_set_passthru_irq (irq %d, gsi %d) fails: %d\n",
>                       prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, ret);
> +     else
> +             irqfd->producer = prod;

cons->add_producer is invoked by __connect() in virt/lib/irqbypass.c,
which itself is called from either irq_bypass_register_consumer() or
irq_bypass_register_producer(). __connect() only records the pairing —
setting cons->producer and prod->consumer — if add_producer returns 0.

  static int __connect(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
                     struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
  {
        [...]
  
        if (!ret) {
                prod->consumer = cons;
                cons->producer = prod;
        }

On failure, no pairing is recorded, so __disconnect() is never called,
and del_producer is never invoked to clear irqfd->producer. The old
unconditional assignment indeed left a dangling pointer on any
kvmppc_set_passthru_irq() failure.

Reviewed-by: Amit Machhiwal <[email protected]>

~Amit

>  
>       return ret;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.45.0

Reply via email to