Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 08:41:20PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: [...]Would we suggest a node; gpio-header { compatible = "bplan,efika-gpio"; gpios = <&gpio-standard 16 0 17 0>; }; gpio-header2 { compatible = "bplan,efika-gpio-wkup"; gpios = <&gpio-wkup 18 0>; };IMO this looks very reasonable. You properly describe the hardware: physical device (header) and its resources.If there are actually two headers, that is. If you use two nodes just to specify which gpio is wkup, that is's a bit ugly... Why not gpio-header { compatible = "bplan,<board>-gpio-header"; gpios = <&standard 16 0 &standard 17 0 &wakeup 18 0>; } And the driver whould know that on this particular <board> third gpio is the wakeup one?
Good point, I concede to your much better plan :D Back to the other discussion, where we give individual GPIOs some names so they are detectable and not just programmable as a bank, do you have any ideas about that? :/ -- Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
