On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, at 17:51, Junrui Luo via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> Patches 1-5 are tagged for stable. 6/6 is deliberately not: it changes the
> atomicity of multi-element mailbox transfers rather than just adding a
> check, so it seems better to let it soak in mainline first.
>
> Build-tested only. I have no Cell or PS3 hardware, so none of this has
> been exercised at runtime.
These are all reasonable fixes as far as I can tell, but I'm missing
information about why you care about spufs. If you used some atomated
tooling, please add some reference to what you used.
Arnd
