Hi Mukesh,

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 05:59:14PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 10:40:35PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 12:11:57 +0200
> > Link Mauve <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I just tested those again in linux-next, with the Wii support series on
> > > top, but now the kernel fails to build due to ARCH_WARN_ASM and
> > > ARCH_WARN_REACHABLE not being defined on PowerPC:
> > > ```
> > > error: no rules expected `ARCH_WARN_ASM`
> > >    --> 
> > > /home/linkmauve/dev/linux/wii/rust/kernel/generated_arch_warn_asm.rs:1:28
> > >     |
> > >   1 | ::kernel::concat_literals!(ARCH_WARN_ASM("{file}", "{line}", 
> > > "{flags}", "{size}"))
> > >     |                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no rules expected this 
> > > token in macro call
> > >     |
> > >    ::: ../rust/kernel/lib.rs:279:1
> > >     |
> > > 279 | macro_rules! concat_literals {
> > >     | ---------------------------- when calling this macro
> > >     |
> > >     = note: while trying to match sequence start
> > > 
> > > error: no rules expected `ARCH_WARN_REACHABLE`
> > >    --> 
> > > /home/linkmauve/dev/linux/wii/rust/kernel/generated_arch_reachable_asm.rs:1:28
> > >     |
> > >   1 | ::kernel::concat_literals!(ARCH_WARN_REACHABLE)
> > >     |                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no rules expected 
> > > this token in macro call
> > >     |
> > >    ::: ../rust/kernel/lib.rs:279:1
> > >     |
> > > 279 | macro_rules! concat_literals {
> > >     | ---------------------------- when calling this macro
> > >     |
> > >     = note: while trying to match sequence start
> > > 
> > > error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
> > > ```
> > 
> > Looks like powerpc needs something like the followings:
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
> > index 0db48977c70c..8aba39e0cf26 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h
> > @@ -32,34 +32,38 @@
> >  #endif /* verbose */
> >  
> >  #else /* !__ASSEMBLER__ */
> > -/* _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY expects args %0,%1,%2,%3 to be FILE, LINE, flags and
> > -   sizeof(struct bug_entry), respectively */
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> > -#define _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY                            \
> > +#define _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY(file, line, flags) \
> >     ".section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n"         \
> >     "2:     .4byte 1b - .\n"                \
> > -   "       .4byte %0 - .\n"                \
> > -   "       .short %1, %2\n"                \
> > -   ".org 2b+%3\n"                          \
> > -   ".previous\n"
> > +   "       .4byte " file " - .\n"          \
> > +   "       .short " line ", " flags "\n"
> >  #else
> > -#define _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY                            \
> > +#define _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY(file, line, flags) \
> >     ".section __bug_table,\"aw\"\n"         \
> >     "2:     .4byte 1b - .\n"                \
> > -   "       .short %2\n"                    \
> > -   ".org 2b+%3\n"                          \
> > -   ".previous\n"
> > +   "       .short " flags "\n"
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  #define BUG_ENTRY(cond_str, insn, flags, ...)              \
> >     __asm__ __volatile__(                           \
> >             "1:     " insn "\n"                     \
> > -           _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY                         \
> > +           _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY("%0", "%1", "%2")       \
> > +           ".org 2b+%3\n"                          \
> > +           ".previous\n"                           \
> >             : : "i" (WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str) __FILE__), "i" 
> > (__LINE__),        \
> >               "i" (flags),                          \
> >               "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry)),       \
> >               ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >  
> > +#define ARCH_WARN_ASM(file, line, flags, size)             \
> > +           "1:     twi 31, 0, 0\n"                 \
> > +           _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY(file, line, flags)      \
> > +           ".org 2b+" size "\n"                    \
> > +           ".previous\n"
> > +
> > +#define ARCH_WARN_REACHABLE
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * BUG_ON() and WARN_ON() do their best to cooperate with compile-time
> >   * optimisations. However depending on the complexity of the condition
> 
> Yeah, This makes sense.
> 
> I'll work on this and send out a fix soon.

Did a fix for this ever materialize? I am still seeing the errors that
Link posted above in next-20260817.

-- 
Cheers,
Nathan

Reply via email to