On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:55:46 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pierre, the approach is somewhat similar to this one: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/26/135 > Posted few months ago. > > I know you don't like it, but I ask you to reconsider it. The > I2C and SPI cases are similar, and recently we tried to write > bindings for some I2C GPIO controllers. > This new version is a bit better in that you've generalised thing more. I'd still prefer if we can have an interface where the driver doesn't have to know that it is on an ACPI/OF/EFI/whatnot host, but I can live with this model for now. Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end encryption. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev