On Mon, 9 Nov 2026 14:40:48 +0100 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/7/26 21:09, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > I think we're slightly talking across purposes, so to be clear - I am > > totally > > fine with you taking any of this through your tree or whatever works for > > you and > > Andrew to avoid merge pain :) > > > > I was just talking more generally about how to merge series that touch a > > lot of > > subsystems and maintainers-who-may-never-reply, etc. > > > > These are the edge cases that make things... fun :) > > > > Anyway, I guess easiest resolution here is for you to take the bits that > > belong > > to your trees and Andrew takes the bits that belong elsewhere? > > Yes, that's what I did now, applying #1,#3,#4,#5,#6 Cool. I'll remove the whole series from mm.git immediately for collision-avoidance reasons - let's sort things out later. I'll get better/more accurate about this soon - I need to set up infrastructure to fetch everyone else's trees, do test merges and figure out what should be removed/fixed in mm.git. I might just base mm.git on everyone-else and always route its stuff ->david. I need to spend a bit of time on this and discuss with the mm-next peeps.
