On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 6:17 PM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 4:35 PM Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Replace use of the legacy vm_flags_t flags with vma_flags_t values in the > > mmap and mprotect LSM hooks of SELinux, AppArmor, IMA and IPE. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> > > --- > > security/apparmor/lsm.c | 2 +- > > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- > > security/ipe/hooks.c | 2 +- > > security/selinux/hooks.c | 14 +++++++------- > > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > Similar to the other patchset you just posted, is there any reason why > individual subsystem maintainers can't pick these patches up, or is > there some reason I'm missing and they need to go through a single > tree? > > If they can go through multiple trees, can you split this patch up? > AppArmor, Integrity/IMA, IPE, and SELinux are all maintained by > different groups/people.
Since there seems to be a desire to bypass normal procedure in favor of speed (surely that will never backfire), the SELinux changes look fine to me, but please do wait to hear from the AppArmor, IMA, and IPE maintainers before merging this patch. Acked-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]> -- paul-moore.com
