On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> +    gpio_direction_output(led_dat->gpio, led_dat->active_low);
>
> This can fail (yeah, the original code didn't check return value
> either).

I've added a check.

>> +            unsigned int flags;
>
> I think it would be better to use `enum of_gpio_flags' type here,
> just for clarity.

You're right, I forgot to change this after the of_get_gpio patch was
changed.

>> +            ret = create_gpio_led(&led, &pdata->led_data[pdata->num_leds++],
>> +                                  &ofdev->dev, NULL);
>> +            if (ret < 0)
>
> of_node_put(np); is missing here.

of_node_put(child) you mean.  It's easy to forget this when one exits one
of these iterators early, since there's no explicit get or put otherwise.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to