On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:18:56PM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Anton Vorontsov
> <avoront...@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:46:45AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > My statement was to convey that the kernel.org kernel should only
> >> > worry itself with the denx.de u-boot (w/regards to compatibility).
> >>
> >> Why?  Unless the BSP u-boots do something insane, I think we should try
> >> to have the upstream kernel boot on the u-boot that comes on the board
> >> (it's not nice to require users to reflash unnecessarily).
> >
> 
> The u-boot that came with the boards (at least MPC8315E-RDB) is too
> old for 2.6.25+ kernels:
> 
> I have run into this earlier:
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg06551.html

"It doesn't work" doesn't imply "It's worthless to try to make it work".

-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to