>>>>> "Timur" == Timur Tabi <[email protected]> writes:
Timur> Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> Why? Does it buy us anything to request_irq again for each channel? >> >> Now we're at it, it seems like there's a check for != NO_IRQ missing >> in fsl_dma_chan_remove(). Timur> If the device tree doesn't specify an interrupts property in Timur> the device channel, then I think that's an error. All the Timur> device trees already do that. So where do you see this Timur> problem? Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/dma.txt and The NO_IRQ check in fsldma.c:fsl_dma_chan_probe() And it makes sense, there's no per-channel DMAC interrupts on mpc83xx. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
