On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 03:31:29PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:23:44PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: >>> I don't see any better solution, should I just leave the core1's >>> mdio node intact? >> >> Ah. We also could change compatible entry to "fsl,gianfar-slave". >> This will prevent gianfar MAC driver to probe on core1. > > ...and also prevent it from probing the children, unless simple-bus is > specified, or Linux is given special knowledge of the > "fsl,gianfar-slave" name.
Yup. Do you see any problem with this? -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmai...@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
