On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:08:55PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > The getter routines in here could really multiplex their return values > with a negative error code, which I generally prefer, but this works I > guess.
I was hoping someone would notice and suggest it. tag you're it! > Do you need a new spacebar? :D nowhydoyouask? > This one is a bug surely? Hmm actually I think you're right. I dont want to push my luck with the gcc hackers though > Gah, gcc sucks. It should just not warn in these cases where it doesn't > know wth is going on. I don't think you'll get any arguments. it only there was a -Wnowarnunused! Yours Tony _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev