On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:08:55PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:

> The getter routines in here could really multiplex their return values
> with a negative error code, which I generally prefer, but this works I
> guess.

I was hoping someone would notice and suggest it.  tag you're it!

> Do you need a new spacebar? :D

nowhydoyouask?
 
> This one is a bug surely?

Hmm actually I think you're right.  I dont want to push my luck with the gcc
hackers though

> Gah, gcc sucks. It should just not warn in these cases where it doesn't
> know wth is going on.

I don't think you'll get any arguments.  it only there was a -Wnowarnunused!

Yours Tony
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to