On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:20:14PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:54:40AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> Vitaly, Anton >>> >>> You guys have used this code.. I was wondering how we decide to used >>> the >>> fixed phy vs another phy. Is this a runtime decision based on >>> something >>> in the device tree or purely at compile time? >> >> It's specified via fixed-link property in the device tree. >> The bindings described in Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/ >> tsec.txt. > > Ok, I want to make sure I can build a platform that uses a normal PHY > that is detected (like a marvell PHY) and and have another platform that > is fixed-link in the same kernel image. Sounds like we'll be ok.
Yep, that will work. -- Anton Vorontsov email: [email protected] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
