Timur Tabi wrote:
       these two are related and seem like we could look for "fsl,cpm2"

That's okay, as long as you don't break compatibility with older
device trees that don't have that property, unless you can demonstrate
that these trees would never work with the current kernel anyway.

All CPM2 device trees should have fsl,cpm2 listed in the compatible of the CPM node.

-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to