On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 13:18 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> OK thanks. So I think we have 2 problems. One with MAX_ORDER <= 9
> that is fixed by the previous patch, and another which is probably
> due to having no memory on node 0 which I will take another look
> at now.
>
> We can merge the previous patch now, though.
Hmm, I'll bet this BUG_ON triggers for Stephen.
diff --git a/mm/slqb.c b/mm/slqb.c
index a651843..e4b3859 100644
--- a/mm/slqb.c
+++ b/mm/slqb.c
@@ -1391,6 +1391,7 @@ static noinline void *__slab_alloc_page(struct kmem_cache
*s,
struct kmem_cache_node *n;
n = s->node_slab[slqb_page_to_nid(page)];
+ BUG_ON(!n);
l = &n->list;
page->list = l;
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
