Tim Abbott wrote: > On Fri, 1 May 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:54:08PM -0400, Tim Abbott wrote: >>> +#define __PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA .section ".data.page_aligned", "aw", >>> @progbits >>> +#define __PAGE_ALIGNED_BSS .section ".bss.page_aligned", "aw", @nobits >> It is my understanding that the linker will automatically >> assume nobits for section names starting with .bss and likewise >> progbits for section names starting with .data - so we can leave them out? > > I believe that is correct. >
... but that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. It's better to be fully explicit when macroizing this kind of stuff. This is part of why macroizing it is good: it means we end up with *one* place that determines this stuff, not some magic heuristics in the linker. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev