Dear Grant Likely, In message <[email protected]> you wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Piotr Ziecik <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Ziecik <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <[email protected]> > > Cc: Grant Likely <[email protected]> > > Cc: John Rigby <[email protected]> > > Missing patch description. Otherwise looks okay.
This is a repeating complaint. Do I really need an extra description for a trivial patch that does exactly what the Subject: says? What is recommended practice in such a case? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] The software required `Windows 95 or better', so I installed Linux. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
