On Jun 10, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Nathaniel Case wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:54:01 -0500, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org
>
wrote:
#define TARGET_85xx
+#define TARGET_HAS_ETH3
This is problematic in that we'd be changing the memory layout of the
bd_t and not ALL 85xx's have HAS_ETH3 set.
It shouldn't be problematic. The bi_enet3addr field is at the end
of the
structure on MPC85xx. The only fields after it in ppcboot.h are
4xx-specific
fields. I believe the MAC addresses were placed at the end of the
struct
for
this very reason.
ahh, good point... I'll add this detail to the commit message when I
commit this.
- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
