* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:24 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> > > Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:14:22 +1000 > > Subject: [PATCH] perfcounters: remove powerpc definitions of > > perf_counter_do_pending > > > > Commit 925d519ab82b6dd7aca9420d809ee83819c08db2 ("perf_counter: > > unify and fix delayed counter wakeup") added global definitions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> > > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
Ah - thanks. The bug was caused by me being a bit too optimistic in applying the shiny-new Power7 support patches on the last day. (nice CPU btw.) > Linus, please apply. BTW, This is _EXACTLY_ why this should have > been in -next for a few days before being merged :-( Not really: for example current upstream is build-broken on x86 due to an integration artifact via the kmemleak tree - despite it having been in linux-next for months. Paulus was building and booting powerpc on a daily basis and i ran cross-builds as well. Such bugs happen, and they are easy enough to fix. What matters arent the 1-2 short-lived bugs that do happen when a new combination of trees is created, but the long-lived combination bugs and conflicts. Ingo _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev