The current definitions set ranges and defaults for 32 and 64-bit
only using "PPC_STD_MMU" which means hash based MMU. This uselessly
restrict the usefulness for the upcoming 64-bit BookE port, but more
than that, it's broken on 32-bit since the only 32-bit platform
supporting multiple page sizes currently is 44x which does -not-
have PPC_STD_MMU_32 set.

This fixes it by using PPC64 and PPC32 instead.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
---

 arch/powerpc/Kconfig |   20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- linux-work.orig/arch/powerpc/Kconfig        2009-07-22 11:22:16.000000000 
+1000
+++ linux-work/arch/powerpc/Kconfig     2009-07-22 11:22:39.000000000 +1000
@@ -492,16 +492,16 @@ endchoice
 
 config FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER
        int "Maximum zone order"
-       range 9 64 if PPC_STD_MMU_64 && PPC_64K_PAGES
-       default "9" if PPC_STD_MMU_64 && PPC_64K_PAGES
-       range 13 64 if PPC_STD_MMU_64 && !PPC_64K_PAGES
-       default "13" if PPC_STD_MMU_64 && !PPC_64K_PAGES
-       range 9 64 if PPC_STD_MMU_32 && PPC_16K_PAGES
-       default "9" if PPC_STD_MMU_32 && PPC_16K_PAGES
-       range 7 64 if PPC_STD_MMU_32 && PPC_64K_PAGES
-       default "7" if PPC_STD_MMU_32 && PPC_64K_PAGES
-       range 5 64 if PPC_STD_MMU_32 && PPC_256K_PAGES
-       default "5" if PPC_STD_MMU_32 && PPC_256K_PAGES
+       range 9 64 if PPC64 && PPC_64K_PAGES
+       default "9" if PPC64 && PPC_64K_PAGES
+       range 13 64 if PPC64 && !PPC_64K_PAGES
+       default "13" if PPC64 && !PPC_64K_PAGES
+       range 9 64 if PPC32 && PPC_16K_PAGES
+       default "9" if PPC32 && PPC_16K_PAGES
+       range 7 64 if PPC32 && PPC_64K_PAGES
+       default "7" if PPC32 && PPC_64K_PAGES
+       range 5 64 if PPC32 && PPC_256K_PAGES
+       default "5" if PPC32 && PPC_256K_PAGES
        range 11 64
        default "11"
        help
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to