> hmm, yes. You do get this and mysterious SEGV if you hit the but so does > other bugs too so this is probably due to missing invalidation. > > I suspect that something like below will fix the problem and > is the "correct" fix(untested, not even compiled):
Ok but do we also still have to worry about the "unpopulated" TLB entries and invalidate them somehow when populating ? Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
