Hi Ben, On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:55:44 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > Looks reasonable. But iseries can be a bitch, so we do need to test it > on monday.
It should be safe as the spinlocks cannot be access until after the
following ppc_md pointer initialisations are done (and all this happens
before the secondary CPUs are started).
But, you are right that there is nothing like actually testing with
iSeries. :-)
> > void __init hpte_init_iSeries(void)
> > {
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iSeries_hlocks); i++)
> > + spin_lock_init(&iSeries_hlocks[i]);
> > +
> > ppc_md.hpte_invalidate = iSeries_hpte_invalidate;
> > ppc_md.hpte_updatepp = iSeries_hpte_updatepp;
> > ppc_md.hpte_updateboltedpp = iSeries_hpte_updateboltedpp;
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpVgSxDnizhs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
