On 24.11.2009, at 16:02, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/24/2009 09:50 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Currently userspace has no chance to find out which virtual address space >> we're >> in and resolve addresses. While that is a big problem for migration, it's >> also >> unpleasent when debugging, as gdb and the monitor don't work on virtual >> addresses. >> > >> index 92045a9..1240fcb 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/kvm.h >> +++ b/include/linux/kvm.h >> @@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ struct kvm_ioeventfd { >> #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS >> #define KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS 41 >> #endif >> +#define KVM_CAP_PPC_SEGSTATE 42 >> >> > > 42 is already taken (s390 psw and D. Adams), please use 43.
Aww. Any reason I didn't get the s390 patch in a git pull yet? (damn that Carsten - he got the cool number) Alex _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev