On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:48:44AM +0100, Francesco VIRLINZI wrote:
> Hi Jeremy
> In November I already sent a proposal on
> a generic linux clk framework.
> On that I would suggest:
>
>>
>> +struct clk {
>> + const struct clk_operations *ops;
>>
> spinlock_t lock;
> const char *name;
> int id;
Name and ID are totally pointless, unless you insist on using the clk
API in the wrong way (like S3C does.)
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
