On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:22:35 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Anatolij Gustschin <ag...@denx.de>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:13:18 +0100
>
> > struct fec_info {
> > - fec_t __iomem *fecp;
> > + void __iomem *fecp;
> ...
> > /* write */
> > -#define FW(_fecp, _reg, _v) __fs_out32(&(_fecp)->fec_ ## _reg, (_v))
> > +#define FW(_regp, _reg, _v) __fs_out32((_regp)->fec_ ## _reg, (_v))
> ...
> > +/* register address macros */
> > +#define fec_reg_addr(_type, _reg) \
> > + (fep->fec.rtbl->fec_##_reg = (u32 __iomem *)((u32)fep->fec.fecp + \
> > + (u32)&((__typeof__(_type) *)NULL)->fec_##_reg))
> > +
> > +#define fec_reg_mpc8xx(_reg) \
> > + fec_reg_addr(struct mpc8xx_fec, _reg)
> > +
> > +#define fec_reg_mpc5121(_reg) \
> > + fec_reg_addr(struct mpc5121_fec, _reg)
>
> This is a step backwards in my view.
>
> If you use the "fec_t __iomem *" type for the register
> pointer, you simply use &p->fecp->XXX to get the I/O
> address of register XXX and that's what you pass to
> the appropriate I/O accessor routines.
>
> Now you've made it typeless, and then you have to walk
> through all of these contortions to get the offset.
OK, i give up
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
