Wolfram Sang wrote: >> overkill to me. I will have a closer look, though. At a minimum I will >> replace "-1" with "MPC_I2C_PRESERVE_CLOCK". > > Might be also an idea to define it with ~0 (clock is still unsigned). If > possible, the code checking for those two cases (0 and "-1") should be close > together. That could be a compromise until more quirks are needed ;)
I just sent v2. Hope it's OK now. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev