Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> overkill to me. I will have a closer look, though. At a minimum I will
>> replace "-1" with "MPC_I2C_PRESERVE_CLOCK".
> 
> Might be also an idea to define it with ~0 (clock is still unsigned). If
> possible, the code checking for those two cases (0 and "-1") should be close
> together. That could be a compromise until more quirks are needed ;)

I just sent v2. Hope it's OK now.

Wolfgang.

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to