On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 22:47 -0400, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:05:40 +0000 Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > > WARN() is used in some places to report firmware or hardware bugs that > > are then worked-around. These bugs do not affect the stability of the > > kernel and should not set the usual TAINT_WARN flag. To allow for > > this, add WARN_TAINT() and WARN_TAINT_ONCE() macros that take a taint > > flag as argument. > > > > Architectures that implement warnings using trap instructions instead > > of calls to warn_slowpath_*() must now implement __WARN_TAINT(taint) > > instead of __WARN(). > > When you say they "must now implement", I assume that you mean that > they _do_ now implement, and that no additional architecture work is > needed.
Right, I believe I fixed-up all the current architectures. There might be more architectures out there, unmerged as yet. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
