On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 09:49 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > Continue to provide IRQF_TIMER as an alias to IRQF_NO_SUSPEND since I > > think it is worth preserving the nice self-documenting name (where it > > is used appropriately). It also avoid needing to patch all the many > > users who are using the flag for an actual timer interrupt. > > I'm not happy about the alias. What about: > > #define __IRQF_TIMER 0x00000200 > #define IRQF_NO_SUSPEND 0x00000400 > > #define IRQF_TIMER (__IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND)
Sure, I'll rework along those lines. Ian. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
