On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:51:55AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 12:59 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > I'm not against it, and I agree some of the patches seem like good > > clean up. I'm concerned about this bit rotting pretty quickly. > > Maybe. Most of it doesn't seem to be that bit-rottable. > > The changes to the asm stuff in misc_32.S for example are functions we > never ever touch once written (libgcc replacements) so I don't see them > rotting more with LE support than they did with BE :-)
Does KVM/qemu support running LE guest on BE host? That'd help keeping the bitrot lower. :) -Olof _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev