> No. of_platform_drivers are more/less obsolete. Normal platform drivers
> can now be associated with a device-tree node just fine.
OK.
If my dts definition is thus:
xps_acqui_data_0: xps-acqui-d...@c9800000 {
compatible = "xlnx,xps-acqui-data-3.00.a";
interrupt-parent = <&xps_intc_0>;
interrupts = < 0 2 >;
reg = < 0xc9800000 0x10000 >;
xlnx,family = "virtex4";
xlnx,include-dphase-timer = <0x1>;
xlnx,mplb-awidth = <0x20>;
xlnx,mplb-clk-period-ps = <0x2710>;
xlnx,mplb-dwidth = <0x40>;
xlnx,mplb-native-dwidth = <0x40>;
xlnx,mplb-p2p = <0x0>;
xlnx,mplb-smallest-slave = <0x20>;
} ;
What are the names I need to pass to platform_driver_register and
platform_device_register_simple ? xps_acqui_data_0, xps-acqui-data or xps-
acqui-data-3.00.a ? None seem to call any init functions...
Why is there not a word about the functions platform_*_register in my various
driver books ? LDD 3rd ed (O'Reilly), Writing LDD (Cooperstein) or LKD
(Love)... Is it something specific to powerpc and the books are oriented x86 ?
What's a good source, besides grepping the kernel to no end ?
--
Guillaume Dargaud
http://www.gdargaud.net/
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
