2.6.27.58-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us 
know.

------------------

From: Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com>

commit e74d098c66543d0731de62eb747ccd5b636a6f4c upstream.

Alan pointed out a race in the code where hvc_remove is invoked. The
recent virtio_console work is the first user of hvc_remove().

Alan describes it thus:

The hvc_console assumes that a close and remove call can't occur at the
same time.

In addition tty_hangup(tty) is problematic as tty_hangup is asynchronous
itself....

So this can happen

        hvc_close                               hvc_remove
        hung up ? - no
                                                lock
                                                tty = hp->tty
                                                unlock
        lock
        hp->tty = NULL
        unlock
        notify del
        kref_put the hvc struct
        close completes
        tty is destroyed
                                                tty_hangup dead tty
                                                tty->ops will be NULL
                                                NULL->...

This patch adds some tty krefs and also converts to using tty_vhangup().

Reported-by: Alan Cox <a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com>
CC: Alan Cox <a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
CC: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>

---
 drivers/char/hvc_console.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: longterm-2.6.27/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
===================================================================
--- longterm-2.6.27.orig/drivers/char/hvc_console.c     2011-01-23 
10:52:15.000000000 +0100
+++ longterm-2.6.27/drivers/char/hvc_console.c  2011-01-29 15:33:05.169065818 
+0100
@@ -312,6 +312,7 @@
        spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->lock, flags);
        /* Check and then increment for fast path open. */
        if (hp->count++ > 0) {
+               tty_kref_get(tty);
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
                hvc_kick();
                return 0;
@@ -320,7 +321,7 @@
        tty->driver_data = hp;
        tty->low_latency = 1; /* Makes flushes to ldisc synchronous. */
 
-       hp->tty = tty;
+       hp->tty = tty_kref_get(tty);
 
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
 
@@ -337,6 +338,7 @@
                spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->lock, flags);
                hp->tty = NULL;
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
+               tty_kref_put(tty);
                tty->driver_data = NULL;
                kref_put(&hp->kref, destroy_hvc_struct);
                printk(KERN_ERR "hvc_open: request_irq failed with rc %d.\n", 
rc);
@@ -364,13 +366,18 @@
                return;
 
        hp = tty->driver_data;
+
        spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->lock, flags);
+       tty_kref_get(tty);
 
        if (--hp->count == 0) {
                /* We are done with the tty pointer now. */
                hp->tty = NULL;
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
 
+               /* Put the ref obtained in hvc_open() */
+               tty_kref_put(tty);
+
                if (hp->ops->notifier_del)
                        hp->ops->notifier_del(hp, hp->data);
 
@@ -387,6 +394,7 @@
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
        }
 
+       tty_kref_put(tty);
        kref_put(&hp->kref, destroy_hvc_struct);
 }
 
@@ -423,6 +431,7 @@
 
        while(temp_open_count) {
                --temp_open_count;
+               tty_kref_put(tty);
                kref_put(&hp->kref, destroy_hvc_struct);
        }
 }
@@ -550,7 +559,7 @@
                poll_mask |= HVC_POLL_WRITE;
 
        /* No tty attached, just skip */
-       tty = hp->tty;
+       tty = tty_kref_get(hp->tty);
        if (tty == NULL)
                goto bail;
 
@@ -627,6 +636,8 @@
 
                tty_flip_buffer_push(tty);
        }
+       if (tty)
+               tty_kref_put(tty);
 
        return poll_mask;
 }
@@ -749,7 +760,7 @@
        struct tty_struct *tty;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->lock, flags);
-       tty = hp->tty;
+       tty = tty_kref_get(hp->tty);
 
        if (hp->index < MAX_NR_HVC_CONSOLES)
                vtermnos[hp->index] = -1;
@@ -761,18 +772,18 @@
        /*
         * We 'put' the instance that was grabbed when the kref instance
         * was initialized using kref_init().  Let the last holder of this
-        * kref cause it to be removed, which will probably be the tty_hangup
+        * kref cause it to be removed, which will probably be the tty_vhangup
         * below.
         */
        kref_put(&hp->kref, destroy_hvc_struct);
 
        /*
-        * This function call will auto chain call hvc_hangup.  The tty should
-        * always be valid at this time unless a simultaneous tty close already
-        * cleaned up the hvc_struct.
+        * This function call will auto chain call hvc_hangup.
         */
-       if (tty)
-               tty_hangup(tty);
+       if (tty) {
+               tty_vhangup(tty);
+               tty_kref_put(tty);
+       }
        return 0;
 }
 


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to