The radix-tree code uses call_rcu when freeing internal elements. We must protect against the elements being freed while we traverse the tree, even if the returned pointer will still be valid.
While preparing a patch to expand the context in which irq_radix_revmap_lookup will be called, I realized that the radix tree was not locked. When asked For a normal call_rcu usage, is it allowed to read the structure in irq_enter / irq_exit, without additional rcu_read_lock? Could an element freed with call_rcu advance with the cpu still between irq_enter/irq_exit (and irq_disabled())? Paul McKenney replied: Absolutely illegal to do so. OK for call_rcu_sched(), but a flaming bug for call_rcu(). And thank you very much for finding this!!! Further analysis: In the current CONFIG_TREE_RCU implementation. CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU (and CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU) uses explicit counters. These counters are reflected from per-CPU to global in the scheduling-clock-interrupt handler, so disabling irq does prevent the grace period from completing. But there are real-time implementations (such as the one use by the Concurrent guys) where disabling irq does -not- prevent the grace period from completing. While an alternative fix would be to switch radix-tree to rcu_sched, I don't want to audit the other users of radix trees (nor put alternative freeing in the library). The normal overhead for rcu_read_lock and unlock are a local counter increment and decrement. This does not show up in the rcu lockdep because in 2.6.34 commit 2676a58c98 (radix-tree: Disable RCU lockdep checking in radix tree) deemed it too hard to pass the condition of the protecting lock to the library. Signed-off-by: Milton Miller <milt...@bga.com> Index: work.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c =================================================================== --- work.git.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c 2011-05-24 21:14:30.860096118 -0500 +++ work.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c 2011-05-24 21:15:55.350096024 -0500 @@ -893,10 +893,13 @@ unsigned int irq_radix_revmap_lookup(str return irq_find_mapping(host, hwirq); /* - * No rcu_read_lock(ing) needed, the ptr returned can't go under us - * as it's referencing an entry in the static irq_map table. + * The ptr returned references the static global irq_map. + * but freeing an irq can delete nodes along the path to + * do the lookup via call_rcu. */ + rcu_read_lock(); ptr = radix_tree_lookup(&host->revmap_data.tree, hwirq); + rcu_read_unlock(); /* * If found in radix tree, then fine. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev