On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Holger Brunck wrote:
> This patch fixes the freescale spi driver for CPM. Without this
> patch SPI on CPM failed because cpm_muram_alloc_fixed tries to
> allocate muram in an preserved area. The error reported was:
> 
> mpc8xxx_spi f0011a80.spi: can't allocate spi parameter ram
> mpc8xxx_spi: probe of f0011a80.spi failed with error -12
> 
> Now the driver uses of_iomap to get access to this area
> similar to i2c driver driver in the i2c-cpm.c which has a
> similar device tree node. This is tested on a MPC8247 with CPM2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com>
> cc: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca>
> cc: spi-devel-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net

Applied, thanks.

g.

> ---
> This was the same problem reported and discussed on ppc-dev for CPM1:
> http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-September/085739.html
> 
>  drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.c |   28 +++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.c
> index 7963c9b..ca57edf 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_fsl_spi.c
> @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static unsigned long fsl_spi_cpm_get_pram(struct 
> mpc8xxx_spi *mspi)
>       struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>       const u32 *iprop;
>       int size;
> -     unsigned long spi_base_ofs;
> +     void __iomem *spi_base;
>       unsigned long pram_ofs = -ENOMEM;
>  
>       /* Can't use of_address_to_resource(), QE muram isn't at 0. */
> @@ -702,33 +702,27 @@ static unsigned long fsl_spi_cpm_get_pram(struct 
> mpc8xxx_spi *mspi)
>               return pram_ofs;
>       }
>  
> -     /* CPM1 and CPM2 pram must be at a fixed addr. */
> -     if (!iprop || size != sizeof(*iprop) * 4)
> -             return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -     spi_base_ofs = cpm_muram_alloc_fixed(iprop[2], 2);
> -     if (IS_ERR_VALUE(spi_base_ofs))
> -             return -ENOMEM;
> +     spi_base = of_iomap(np, 1);
> +     if (spi_base == NULL)
> +             return -EINVAL;
>  
>       if (mspi->flags & SPI_CPM2) {
>               pram_ofs = cpm_muram_alloc(SPI_PRAM_SIZE, 64);
> -             if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(pram_ofs)) {
> -                     u16 __iomem *spi_base = cpm_muram_addr(spi_base_ofs);
> -
> -                     out_be16(spi_base, pram_ofs);
> -             }
> +             out_be16(spi_base, pram_ofs);
>       } else {
> -             struct spi_pram __iomem *pram = cpm_muram_addr(spi_base_ofs);
> +             struct spi_pram __iomem *pram = spi_base;
>               u16 rpbase = in_be16(&pram->rpbase);
>  
>               /* Microcode relocation patch applied? */
>               if (rpbase)
>                       pram_ofs = rpbase;
> -             else
> -                     return spi_base_ofs;
> +             else {
> +                     pram_ofs = cpm_muram_alloc(SPI_PRAM_SIZE, 64);
> +                     out_be16(spi_base, pram_ofs);
> +             }
>       }
>  
> -     cpm_muram_free(spi_base_ofs);
> +     iounmap(spi_base);
>       return pram_ofs;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to