On Friday, July 8, 2011, Tabi Timur-B04825 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "MPC85xxDS" - for a virtual machine for the e500v2 type platforms >> and would support 85xx targets, plus P2020, P1022,etc >> >> "corenet-32-ds" - for a virtual machine similar to the 32-bit P4080 >> platforms >> >> "corenet-64-ds" - for a virtual machine based on a 64-bit corenet >> platform > > I think we should drop the "DS" because that's a name applied to > certain Freescale reference boards. > > Is being a CoreNet board really something meaningful with respect to > KVM? I don't see the connection. > > Also, if these are KVM creations, shouldn't there be a "kvm" in the > compatible string somewhere?
I would say so. That would accurately describe the execution environment. > > -- > Timur Tabi > Linux kernel developer at Freescale > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
