On 7/19/11, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:53:50 +0400 > Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbarysh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +static struct of_device_id __initdata mpc85xx_common_ids[] = { >> + { .type = "soc", }, >> + { .compatible = "soc", }, >> + { .compatible = "simple-bus", }, >> + { .compatible = "gianfar", }, >> + { .compatible = "fsl,qe", }, >> + { .compatible = "fsl,cpm2", }, >> + {}, >> +}; > > Same comment as for 83xx regarding localbus and compatibility with old > device trees.
I checked for in-kernel device trees. Unless I miss something, there are no leftovers from this list. (83xx provided no simple-bus property for localbus, so your argument is valid there). If we should care about strange cases, not even blessed by kernel trees, I can add some of the old probes back. What do you thing? -- With best wishes Dmitry _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev