> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] > On Behalf Of Anton Vorontsov > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 18:15 PM > To: Zang Roy-R61911 > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; akpm@linux- > foundation.org; Xu Lei-B33228; Kumar Gala > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] eSDHC: Fix errors when booting kernel with fsl > esdhc > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 06:15:17PM +0800, Roy Zang wrote: > [...] > > if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_200) { > > - ctrl = sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL); > > - ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_DMA_MASK; > > - if ((host->flags & SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA) && > > - (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_ADMA)) > > - ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_ADMA32; > > - else > > - ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_SDMA; > > - sdhci_writeb(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL); > > + if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_QORIQ_PROCTL_WEIRD) { > > +#define ESDHCI_PROCTL_DMAS_MASK 0x00000300 > > +#define ESDHCI_PROCTL_ADMA32 0x00000200 > > +#define ESDHCI_PROCTL_SDMA 0x00000000 > > + ctrl = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL); > > + ctrl &= ~ESDHCI_PROCTL_DMAS_MASK; > > + if ((host->flags & SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA) && > > + (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_ADMA)) > > + ctrl |= ESDHCI_PROCTL_ADMA32; > > + else > > + ctrl |= ESDHCI_PROCTL_SDMA; > > + sdhci_writel(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL); > > + } else { > > + ctrl = sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL); > > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_DMA_MASK; > > + if ((host->flags & SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA) && > > + (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_ADMA)) > > + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_ADMA32; > > + else > > + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_SDMA; > > + sdhci_writeb(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL); > > We try to not pollute generic sdhci.c driver with chip-specific > quirks. > > Maybe you can do the fixups via IO accessors? Or by introducing > some additional sdhci op? > > [...] > > if (power != (unsigned short)-1) { > > switch (1 << power) { > > +#define ESDHCI_FSL_POWER_MASK 0x40 > > +#define ESDHCI_FSL_POWER_180 0x00 > > +#define ESDHCI_FSL_POWER_300 0x40 > > Same here. The driver will rot quickly if everyone would start > putting chip-specific quirks into sdhci.c. Please don't. IO accessors or sdhci op might work, but it will look ugly and less performance efficient for io access.
If you search sdhci.c, you will see other board specific quirks. Thanks. Roy _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
