On 08/09/2011 02:49 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Yes. The doc for the bindings we speak about > > http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.0.1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt > > sneaked into the kernel without been presented on any mailing list and > without the corresponding driver patch.
It was posted on linuxppc-dev: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/91980/ Though I agree it should have been posted more widely. > OK, just > > "fsl,p1010-flexcan" > > or > > "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan" I'm ok with the latter, if there's enough in common that it's conceivable that a driver wouldn't care. The more specific compatible will be there if the driver wants to make use of it later. -Scot _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
