On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:06:02PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
> an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
> on the Freescale P1010 processor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <h...@sgi.com>
> To: Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <w...@grandegger.com>
> To: U Bhaskar-B22300 <b22...@freescale.com>
> Cc: socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> index 68cbe52..662f832 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> @@ -1027,8 +1027,19 @@ static int __devexit flexcan_remove(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct of_device_id flexcan_of_match[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "fsl,flexcan",
Let me make sure I have this correct. At this point, we would want it
to be fsl,flexcan here. If, at some point, we find the i.MX-wonderful
has diverged from the -p1010, we would, at that point in the code, use
of_device_is_compatible to differentiate the two, correct? That would
mean we should make no change to this patch for the fsl,flexcan-p1010,
right?
Robin
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
