> > Which is a problem because the compiler could schedule
> > it be written back to real memory between the instructions.
>
> It can? There is no memory here, just registers. Even if it
> is written to memory, how would that affect the register?
Although the function argument is passed in a register, the
compiler could generate a store-load sequence before and
after each __asm__() line.
> Assuming you are right, would rewriting it to
> __asm__("rlwimi %0,%0,16,0x00ff0000\n\t"
> "rlwinm %0,%0,24,0x0000ffff"
> : "+r"(value));
> help?
Except that now you've stopped the compiler scheduling
another instruction between the two - probably forcing a
execution stall.
David
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
