On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
That is an easy port but I will have to do that blind. Would you
mind take this for a spin on 2.4 first?
My current system is running 2.6, so I don't have much
interested in testing 2.4
The more interesting part is if one should use other sized(16K or
512K) large pages too?
My thought long ago was most of the 8xx systems have rather small
real memories, so the larger pages, especially 512K may be too wasteful.
I've always been a fan of keeping the TLB handlers tiny and simple,
rather then spending the instructions doing complex replacements.
Remember, this also affects the I- and D-cache, so a more frequent
and trivial PTE update could very well gain larger system performance
than the management of larger pages with more complex code.
With all of the bug fix code in the handlers, maybe a larger page would
be better.
Those should be useful for user space but it is a lot of work. I
haven't checked
what large page support for user space is in 2.6 for ppc though.
The 2.6/3.0 kernel supports different, but fixed, page sizes. IIRC,
anything
over 64K may require distribution rebuilding to realign code/data
sections
to more restrictive boundaries. Maybe a 16K page would show some
benefit.
I'll try to make some time to play with it.
Thanks.
-- Dan
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
