>Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] powerpc/85xx: add sleep and deep sleep support
>
>On 11/04/2011 07:33 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
>> +/* Cast the ccsrbar to 64-bit parameter so that the assembly
>> + * code can be compatible with both 32-bit & 36-bit */
>> +extern void mpc85xx_enter_deep_sleep(u64 ccsrbar, u32 powmgtreq);
>
>/*
> * Please use proper
> * Linux multi-line comment format.
> */
>
>>  static int pmc_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>>  {
>>      int ret;
>> +    u32 powmgtreq = 0x00500000;
>
>Where does this 0x00500000 come from?  Please symbolically define
>individual bits.
>
>The comment in the asm code says it should be 0x00100000, BTW.

I think we should get rid of the powmgtreq argument, as we don't support 
multiple modes for mpc85xx_enter_deep_sleep() now.

>
>> +
>> +    switch (state) {
>> +    case PM_SUSPEND_MEM:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
>> +            enable_kernel_spe();
>> +#endif
>
>Should comment that currently only e500v2 hardware supports deep sleep
>-- else we'd need to save normal FP here.
>
>> +            pr_debug("Entering deep sleep\n");
>> +
>> +            local_irq_disable();
>> +            mpc85xx_enter_deep_sleep(get_immrbase(),
>> +                            powmgtreq);
>> +            pr_debug("Resumed from deep sleep\n");
>> +
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    /* else fall-through */
>> +    case PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY:
>
>What fall-through?  You just returned.
>
>> +    }
>>
>> -    /* Upon resume, wait for SLP bit to be clear. */
>> -    ret = spin_event_timeout((in_be32(&pmc_regs->pmcsr) & PMCSR_SLP) ==
>0,
>> -                             10000, 10) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
>> -    if (ret)
>> -            dev_err(pmc_dev, "tired waiting for SLP bit to clear\n");
>> -    return ret;
>>  }
>
>Remove that blank line as well.
>
>> @@ -58,13 +101,23 @@ static const struct platform_suspend_ops
>pmc_suspend_ops = {
>>      .enter = pmc_suspend_enter,
>>  };
>>
>> -static int pmc_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>> +static int pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>> -    pmc_regs = of_iomap(ofdev->dev.of_node, 0);
>> +    struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +
>> +    pmc_regs = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
>>      if (!pmc_regs)
>>              return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> -    pmc_dev = &ofdev->dev;
>> +    has_deep_sleep = 0;
>> +    if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,mpc8536-pmc"))
>> +            has_deep_sleep = 1;
>> +
>> +    has_lossless = 0;
>> +    if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,p1022-pmc"))
>> +            has_lossless = 1;
>> +
>
>You never use has_lossless.

It will be used in the later patch in the series.

- Leo

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to