On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:25 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > > Also there have been at least 3 versions in a couple of days already > > without comments nor indication of what was changed... > > Unfortunately, no response from those sub-system guys. > > > Can you clarify things a bit please ? It looks like they really should > > go to linuxppc-dev (and you can probably drop a bunch of other lists) or > > am I missing an important piece of the puzzle ? (Such as patch 1/4 and > > 2/4 ...) > > I have not sent the whole series. The changes are documented in the > cover-letter, which I have not sent for those patches. Well, I think > it's better to sent the whole series to all parties instead?
Well at least for linuxppc-dev, don't bother now that I know what this is about :-) > > Let me know if I should just remove them from powerpc patchwork. > > Dave has already applied all patches. > > Sorry for the confusion. Any advice on how to handle multi subsystem > series of patches properly is welcome. No specific advice. Ideally, if patchwork could track cover letters it would help but I don't see a non-nasty way to do it so ... :-) Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev