IFC NAND Machine calculates ECC on 512byte sector. Same is taken care in
fsl_ifc_run_command() while ECC status verification. Here buffer number is
calculated assuming 512byte sector and same is passed to is_blank.
However in is_blank() buffer address is calculated using mdt->writesize which is
wrong. It should be calculated on basis of ecc sector size.

Also, in fsl_ifc_run_command() bufferpage is calculated on the basis of ecc 
sector
size instead of hard coded value.

Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggr...@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabha...@freescale.com>
---
  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git (branch next)

 This patch is created on top of IFC driver patch (already floated in mailing
 list). Please find their link:
 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/133315/
 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/133316/

 Tested on P1010RDB

 Changes for v2: Incorporated Scott's comments
        - Updated copyright
        - is_blank - works on ecc buffer block 
        - check_read_ecc() - Calculate actual ecc buffer number

 drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c |   14 ++++++++------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c
index 8475b88..c0529ea 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /*
  * Freescale Integrated Flash Controller NAND driver
  *
- * Copyright 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
+ * Copyright 2011,2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
  *
  * Author: Dipen Dudhat <dipen.dud...@freescale.com>
  *
@@ -191,12 +191,12 @@ static int is_blank(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int 
bufnum)
 {
        struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
        struct fsl_ifc_mtd *priv = chip->priv;
-       u8 __iomem *addr = priv->vbase + bufnum * (mtd->writesize * 2);
+       u8 __iomem *addr = priv->vbase + bufnum * chip->ecc.size;
        u32 __iomem *mainarea = (u32 *)addr;
        u8 __iomem *oob = addr + mtd->writesize;
        int i;
 
-       for (i = 0; i < mtd->writesize / 4; i++) {
+       for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.size / 4; i++) {
                if (__raw_readl(&mainarea[i]) != 0xffffffff)
                        return 0;
        }
@@ -215,12 +215,15 @@ static int is_blank(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int 
bufnum)
 static int check_read_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct fsl_ifc_ctrl *ctrl,
                          u32 *eccstat, unsigned int bufnum)
 {
+       struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
+       int bufperpage = mtd->writesize / chip->ecc.size;
+       int eccbuf_num = bufnum + (bufnum / bufperpage) * bufperpage;
        u32 reg = eccstat[bufnum / 4];
        int errors = (reg >> ((3 - bufnum % 4) * 8)) & 15;
 
        if (errors == 15) { /* uncorrectable */
                /* Blank pages fail hw ECC checks */
-               if (is_blank(mtd, bufnum))
+               if (is_blank(mtd, eccbuf_num))
                        return 1;
 
                /*
@@ -273,7 +276,7 @@ static void fsl_ifc_run_command(struct mtd_info *mtd)
                dev_err(priv->dev, "NAND Flash Write Protect Error\n");
 
        if (nctrl->eccread) {
-               int bufperpage = mtd->writesize / 512;
+               int bufperpage = mtd->writesize / chip->ecc.size;
                int bufnum = (nctrl->page & priv->bufnum_mask) * bufperpage;
                int bufnum_end = bufnum + bufperpage - 1;
 
-- 
1.7.5.4


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to