> 
> I'm hacking here an i.MX35 not an i.MX23. So I already had a look at its
> errata sheet http://cache.freescale.com/files/dsp/doc/errata/IMX35CE.pdf
> but didn't find a similar "limitation" as you now pointed out by errata
> number 2858 for i.MX23.
>

i.mx35 and i.mx23 uses the same controller.
 
> What about the fix for mv_udc, shouldn't they have a similar
> "limitation"? How do you explain?
> Or maybe someone from Marvell has an answer?
>
It is probably that others who use chipidea core have the same problem,
but it needs to get confirm from them.  

> 
> Thanks,
>  -- Christoph


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to