Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> writes:

> On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 00:30 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> > Should we keep the tas_create method for those ? We could have some code
>> > in the aoa core file that calls those "fixups" to create missing
>> > devices...
>> 
>> I'm not sure if the function is needed, if the device can be created in
>> i2c_powermac_register_devices.
>
> But it doesn't have a device-node ... does it ? Which machine is this
> btw ?

It's a PowerMac G5.  During booting I see this:

PowerMac i2c bus pmu 2 registered
PowerMac i2c bus pmu 1 registered
PowerMac i2c bus mac-io 0 registered
i2c i2c-5: i2c-powermac: modalias failure on 
/ht@0,f2000000/pci@1/mac-io@7/i2c@18000/deq@6a
i2c i2c-5: i2c-powermac: invalid reg on 
/ht@0,f2000000/pci@1/mac-io@7/i2c@18000/i2c-modem
PowerMac i2c bus u3 1 registered
i2c i2c-6: i2c-powermac: modalias failure on 
/u3@0,f8000000/i2c@f8001000/cereal@1c0
PowerMac i2c bus u3 0 registered

The deq node has no compatible, perhaps the modalias can be constructed
out of the name instead?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to